Did You Get Your Free Obamaphone? Part 2
by Robert Morley
Remember the “Obamaphone lady?” Her YouTube rant went viral and was watched by millions in the lead-up to President Barack Obama’s reelection.
She explained: “Everybody in Cleveland, you’re a minority got Obamaphone. Keep Obama in president. … He gave us a phone. He going to do more.”
And “do more” he did. In 2013, the government spent $2 billion on Obamaphones, although that wasn’t even enough for many people. Following President Obama’s reelection victory, Florida resident Peggy Joseph made national television for her comments: “It was the most memorable time of my life. … I never thought this day would ever happen. I won’t have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won’t have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know, if I help him, he’s gonna help me”
America is ripe for socialism. But does socialism lead to freedom?
Although the government never quite went as far as paying people’s mortgages or gasoline, it did use taxpayer money on mortgage modifications, first-time buyers programs, and cash for clunkers. These programs were really more corporate welfare than social welfare.
In 2013, the Washington Post ran a story titled “In Florida, a Food-Stamp Recruiter Deals With Wrenching Choices.” It showed how even Republican states had become active promoters for the federal government’s food stamp program, because states had become addicted to government welfare money.
States hired recruiters to go out and convince people that they “deserved” food stamps. They would hold food stamp parties at local senior citizen’s homes, golf courses and community centers. They would hand out gift bags with cookies and croissants, doggie toys for dog people and cat food for cat people. The government even produced a recruiter manual with techniques on how to “overcome the word ‘no.’” Recruiters were trained to disarm any hesitation: “You are an American, and this is your benefit”; “Applying is easy”; “Every $5 in SNAP generates $9.20 for the local economy.”
It became patriotic to join the food stamp program!
That last reason is why the states have become the biggest promoters of food stamps. It is free money from the federal government that flows directly into local economies. Each dollar of federal money supposedly generates $1.84 in local economic activity. What is never said is that $1.84 in activity gained by Paul comes at the expense of Peter who lives somewhere else.
A decade ago, only about half of people who could technically qualify for food stamps signed up. After intensive recruiting, those numbers have been boosted to around 75 percent.
Almost 45 million Americans now rely on food stamps. That is more than one in seven people.
Today, approximately 60 percent of America’s budget goes to social welfare programs (including social security, which some people incorrectly argue is not a welfare program). This has doubled since 1960, when many welfare programs were established.
Stated another way, social welfare-type programs consumed an astounding 12.2 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014. The Congressional Research Service predicts that it will hit 14 percent by 2025. It is actually even more than it sounds because
GDP also includes government spending. Compared against private consumption, production and trade—the other components of GDP—social welfare spending is already above 14 percent.
According to the conservative Heritage Foundation, there are now 80 means-tested federal welfare programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care, social services, training and targeted educational aid to the poor. Add in non-means-tested programs and the number rises to 93. States and cities have additional programs.
Nearly 110 million Americans live in households that receive some form of means-tested government welfare. And many of these households include more than one person on assistance. These numbers do not include Social Security or Medicare. Count these programs, and there are over 150 million Americans—almost half of the nation is dependent on the government in some form.
Many of these people actually need help. And if people do, they should use those programs. That is what they are for. But what does it say about America when half the nation is reliant on government for survival. Is this what freedom is?
As greater numbers of people rely on these welfare plans, it will become increasingly difficult to cut the programs back.
Regardless of motivation, the result is a population that becomes progressively reliant on government—and thus reliant on increasingly powerful politicians who hold sway over increasingly large portions of the economy.
As certain states just found out, if a state doesn’t support the federal government’s decision to let transsexuals and transgenders use bathrooms and locker rooms of their choice, then the federal government will cut the state’s education funding. In like manner, various local law enforcement agencies are threatened with having their access to surplus military equipment cut when they won’t implement Justice Department demands.
The end result of socialist policies is always the same: a big, oppressive, freedom-reducing government—and less overall prosperity. Conversely, in socialist regimes there tend to be fewer rich people. There are also fewer poor people, at least at first. But society as a whole is also less prosperous, as inefficient governments penalize the producers to subsidize the users. It is basic economics: If you want more of something, then subsidize it.
This might sound harsh, but by subsidizing the poor, you will eventually end up with more.
Ask any Greek. Talk to someone from Puerto Rico. Eventually, there simply aren’t enough taxpayers left to support tax takers. Where are Puerto Rico’s doctors and lawyers? Where are the wealthy? Why have they left the island? When the money runs out—and it always does—the welfare recruiters turn into street demonstrators. The people revolt. Chaos reigns. And then real hardship and poverty set in.
Argentina, Venezuela and Greece are going through that process today.
Will America learn the lesson before its industrialized welfare industry completely transforms the nation?
The end of my phone conversation is enlightening:
Well how do I get out of this SafeLink phone program?
Silence. … Long pause. … More awkward silence.
“Out of it?”
I just want my old Tracphone plan back.
“Yes sir. I will just need you to … give me the phone ID number again … and then .…”