The correct answer to , what is the first amendment, is something that I have yet to hear. The response I do get from most everyone that I have spoken to about this amendment is typically, "freedom of religion". And there lies the starting point for most disagreements. I want to carefully examine this amendment, from a lay persons perspective, to deal with it fairly and accurately.
First, let's take a direct quote from the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution itself, shall we?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
Just about every lawsuit (usually frivolous) that I have read about dealing with this aspect of what is the first amendment, and I think you'll agree, had to do with either prayer in a public place or a "religious" symbol on display in a public place such as a government facility.
Let's start out by just hitting this "establishment of religion" thing between the eyes. As I see it a group of children praying before a football game or a display of the Ten Commandments in no way violates this amendment. Without getting wrapped up in any legalese it's safe to say that as long as the school administration (the government) did not require (make a law respecting an establishment of religion) that a prayer be recited and the prayer was initiated by the students then they would be operating within acceptable parameters.
Unfortunately, what typically transpires is a zealous response to prohibit this activity under the pretense that allowing this act to continue would be a violation of the separation of "church and state".
There is no need for attorneys to enter the picture and lawsuits to be filed in a court of law. I think that most Americans unfortunately get their understanding of the meaning of this amendment through controlled sound bites in the media as well as what is taught in our schools.
Examining the second part of the religion aspect of what is the first amendment, if the students, or team members, as a majority of the student body, took it upon themselves to gather in prayer, even silently, then they are within their constitutional right. The intervention by school authorities would, however, be "prohibiting the free exercise thereof".
What typically is presented as a defense by those deeply afraid of religion creeping into the public sector is their concern for those that are of a different persuasion. After all, there may be atheists, Jews, or Muslims on the team that might be offended. My response to them is that as long as they are not required to participate then, one, there is no reason to be offended, two, those that choose to pray are simply exercising their constitutional right, and three, if the school officials are not coercing the students in any way then the ball is in fair play. End of discussion.
I wonder, would this passion for limiting the freedom of religious expression to behind closed doors be vigorously enforced whenever a Muslim were to begin praying in a public school, or would it be toned down.? Better yet, would it be completely absent?
According to a summary written by justice Robert Jackson in the 1943 case, West Virginia v. Barnette, "if there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein."
Debate on any public issue, no matter how heated it may become, should always be uninhibited and open to all.
Since the re-election of President Obama it is now obvious, even to his supporters, that there is not as much free speech flowing about the capital as there used to be. Anytime a criticism is voiced regarding this president and his administration it is put down as a racially motivated attack in an attempt to silence the prejudiced critics.
Where have the media watchdogs been sent to because it is now very apparent that this administration is shamelessly..."abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press".
There appears to be a complicit relationship between the government that we are supposed to be holding accountable and the media that is expected by the citizens to report to us the daily affairs of our elected officials. Not untl recently have I seen any degree of criticism regarding the actions, or lack thereof, of this administration.
Case in point, the roll-out of Obamacare. Now that we are well into this new and better healthcare system we are finding out that the White House has been blatantly silencing the media from reporting the truth regarding the shortcomings of Obamacare, White House Order Health Insurance Companies to not criticize Obamacare. Several years ago one would never find such a report in print. Is the press beginning to reassert its constitutional muscle and ask themselves what is the first amendment?
How is it that the press is willing to muzzle itself with regard to this president? Why are things so lopsided with regard to what is the first amendment? The relationship between the two is like that of a parent and a beloved yet unruly child who in their eyes can do know wrong, no matter how obvious and detrimental that behavior may be.
If any person or group known to be conservative in its ideology utters a phrase it is analyzed and dissected for the purpose of allegedly revealing how dangerous and evil it really is and therefore must be silenced or eliminated whether through ridicule or legal recourse.
No matter what the issue is the press goes about with blinders on seemingly unaware or unwilling to hold this administration accountable. Here are some recent incidents that illustrate how what is the first amendment rights of the press have been trampled upon without any objection by most:
Yes. Discussions regarding what is the first amendment is not what it used to be. It appears that our precious Constitution is being held captive by a an elite few determined to stay in power.
The questions I leave for my readers to contemplate is simply this;
If you have been quietly standing by simply because you don't believe you can make a difference then take courage from this website. I once thought I didn't matter. But I then realized that it only takes one person to speak up and be heard and cause the masses to be awakened from its slumber. That is why I started this site. I believe that I make a difference.
Watch diligently over your nation and never cease to ask what is the first amendment for. Don't count on someone else to do it for you. You may not like who steps up to fill that void.
Return to Constitution of the United States
We'd love to hear what you have to say. Share it!
Click below to see contributions from other visitors to this page...
State Governments continue their assault on the Church Not rated yet
President Obama’s transgender agenda has taken huge leaps forward in the last year or so. There have been orders for public building managers, for colleges …
Liberals are moving aggressively to "amend the First Amendment" Not rated yet
A key Federal Election Commission Republican warned Wednesday that liberals are moving aggressively to "amend the First Amendment" so that conservatives …
Nov 11, 17 12:30 PM
Declining health is threatening national security. The United States Armed Forces is an all-volunteer force that boasts an elite reputation. A large part
Oct 19, 17 10:48 PM
Where do I find your coverage of the subject of death and hell?
Jul 04, 17 03:06 PM
In the Bible, the book of Daniel describes a spectacular military clash to occur between two major powers right before a horribly destructive global war that will threaten to destroy every last human…
Jul 04, 17 03:01 PM
United States Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump have repeatedly criticized European nato members for not paying their fair share on military expenditures.
Mar 08, 17 05:42 PM
U.S. companies added a whopping 298,000 new jobs in February, beating economists’ expectations by more than 100,000. The report from ADP, a global human resources and payroll firm, provides the first…
AmericaExtinct is a labor of love. It takes hours each week to research, accumulate and present what you see here. If you visit often and enjoy the content than that is the greatest compliment you can pay.
Would you consider joining this worthy cause as a sponsor with either a recurring monthly donation of your choosing or a one-time donation to offset the monthly cost of maintaining this site?
We appreciate your patronage and support
This short video (that will not be online for much longer) will reveal some simple electricity reducing tips. This is honest information tested by thousands the world over!
Watch this video until the end as it has a surprising twist!
DIABETES DESTROYER - THIS IS AN INNOVATION AND STEP BY STEP ALL-NATURAL DIABETES SOLUTION THAT WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO START REVERSING TYPE 2 DIABETES AND PRE-DIABETES IN A LITTLE AS ONE WEEK - CLICK HERE
Still Addicted? 95 percent of recovery programs in the U. S. are not based on solid research and evidence. While many “lesser-known” techniques produce ASTOUNDING results. There are proven ways to dramatically decrease cravings, urges, intrusive thoughts and withdrawal symptoms. Make sure you watch the whole video as the end will surprise you.